Human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, has questioned the impact of Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal, saying citizens have yet to see clear benefits from the funds saved.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Sunday Politics, Falana said governments at all levels must explain how the additional revenue is being spent, particularly as Nigerians continue to face high living costs.
He argued that Nigeria earns more from crude oil while government revenue has increased, yet roads, transport and other basic services remain major concerns for citizens.
Falana also said much of the money previously allocated for fuel imports now goes towards debt servicing, raising questions about how the subsidy savings can improve living conditions.
With the 2027 elections approaching, Falana’s comments add to the growing debate over the subsidy removal and whether Nigerians have received sufficient value from the increased government revenue.





